Encryption Architecture v2
Changes from v1
Deleted outerSessionKey. innerSessionKey is renamed to sessionKey and is now stored in plaintext in session storage alongside the
privateDataJwe
which it encrypts.Moved cache of WebAuthn RP ID and user handle from local storage to session storage.
These changes were made in order to support using the app in multiple tabs signed in to the same account, and to sign out of existing tabs if any tab signs out or signs in to a different account.
Encryption Architecture v2
wwWallet uses the WebAuthn prf
extension
to derive encryption keys for the wallet contents, including the user's private
proof signing key. This document explains the encryption architecture and its
design rationale, as well as providing critique of the same.
The wallet uses the following keys and data types, as labeled in the above diagram:
EncryptedContainer
: The user's wallet contents in encrypted form. This is stored both in the backend server database, and downloaded to the client's local storage when the user signs in to the wallet.PrivateData
: The cleartext contents of anEncryptedContainer
. This contains both sensitive data, namely privateKey, and non-sensitive data, including the user's DID and public proof signing key. All of these contents are encrypted at rest on both the server side and the client side.privateKey: The user's proof signing secp256r1 private key. This is the long-lived key that is used to prove the user's ownership of the wallet. This key is generated once, as part of creating the user's wallet when they first create a wwWallet account.
The privateKey member of
PrivateData
is encrypted an additional time using the same encryption key.privateKey is only kept in volatile memory, and is never written to persistent storage in unencrypted form.
mainKey: The 256-bit AES-GCM encryption key of the
EncryptedContainer
. This is used to decrypt the containedPrivateData
and is itself stored in encrypted (wrapped) form in theEncryptedContainer
, encrypted using each of the user's prfKeys and, if applicable, passwordKey.This key is generated once, as part of creating the user's wallet when they first create a wwWallet account.
mainKey is only kept in volatile memory, and is never written to persistent storage in unencrypted form.
prfKey: An 256-bit AES-KW key-wrapping key derived using the WebAuthn
prf
extension. This is used to unwrap the mainKey in order to decrypt theEncryptedContainer
contents during sign-in.The user may have 0 or more instances of prfKey (or at least 1, when password authentication is disabled), each corresponding to a WebAuthn credential the user may use to sign in to the backend service.
The prfSalt and HKDF parameters used to derive prfKey are randomly generated once, when the corresponding WebAuthn credential is registered.
prfKey is only kept in volatile memory, and is never written to persistent storage in unencrypted form.
passwordKey: A 256-bit AES-KW key-wrapping key derived from a password using PBKDF2. This is a legacy feature that is usually disabled. Like prfKey, this is used to unwrap the mainKey in order to decrypt the
EncryptedContainer
contents during sign-in.The PBKDF2 salt used to derive passwordKey is randomly generated once, when the account is created. Changing the password is not possible as of this writing.
passwordKey is only kept in volatile memory, and is never written to persistent storage in unencrypted form.
sessionKey: A 256-bit AES-GCM encryption key used to decrypt the
EncryptedContainer
for the duration of a session.Upon successful sign-in, the user's prfKey or passwordKey is used to unwrap mainKey which in turn decrypts the
EncryptedContainer
to access the cleartextPrivateData
. ThePrivateData
is then re-encrypted using a newly generated sessionKey, resulting in the ciphertextprivateDataJwe
which is stored in the client's session storage. The sessionKey is also stored in session storage alongside theprivateDataJwe
.
Design rationale
The primary concerns during the development of this design was to keep all key material on the client side, and to minimize the exposure of long-lived secrets. Thus we keep the wallet contents encrypted at rest, and introduced the session keys by the following rationale.
Re-encrypting wallet contents to a session key
Since we keep the wallet contents encrypted at rest, we need to decrypt it whenever we need to access the contents. This would require handling the mainKey for decryption, but the mainKey is a long-lived key that is not easily replaceable (see below). Therefore we use the mainKey to decrypt the contents only once, and then use temporary encryption key for the remainder of the session. This way we minimize the exposure of the mainKey.
Selection of client-side storage areas
We use the Web Crypto API for encryption, decryption and key
management operations. The CryptoKey
objects do not survive page reload or
top-level navigation unless stored in some persistent storage. We use two
client-side storage areas: local storage and session
storage.
Local storage
We store the EncryptedContainer
in local storage in
anticipation of the possibility to use the wallet in offline mode in the future.
We also cache some other parameters:
The prfKey derivation parameters for each user that has logged in on the machine, and a display name for the user. These are used to eliminate the need for the user to authenticate twice to sign in to the wallet: once to retrieve the
EncryptedContainer
, including the PRF salts used to derive a prfKey, and once to evaluate the PRF with the retrieved salt. The cached salt allows both of these steps to be performed in a single WebAuthn authentication ceremony. The user may delete any entry of this cache while logged out.The user's WebAuthn user handle, needed to detect if the user signs in to a different account in a different browser tab and log out of the older tab in that case.
Session storage
We store the sessionKey and re-encrypted privateDataJwe
in session
storage so that they expire when the user closes the browser
tab. We also cache some other parameters:
The WebAuthn RP ID for the wwWallet service, needed to derive prfKeys. This could be a configuration constant of the frontend app, but the backend already sends it during the initial authentication or signup, so we cache the value and eliminate the possibility of config mismatch.
The user's WebAuthn user handle, needed to detect if the user signs in to a different account in a different browser tab and log out of the older tab in that case.
Encrypting privateKey twice
Since privateKey is more sensitive than other members of PrivateData
,
we encrypt it an additional time so that we can access the other members of
PrivateData
without exposing privateKey in cleartext unnecessarily.
Critique
This design has some drawbacks, and some of the intended advantages are debatable. The following critique may inform a revised design. This is not exhaustive; we invite additional and ongoing review and critique of the design.
Rotating the main encryption key
The mainKey cannot easily be replaced since that would require access to each prfKey and passwordKey in order to update each corresponding key wrapping. This could be solved by having each prfKey and passwordKey wrap an ECDH private key instead of wrapping the mainKey directly, and instead using ECDH to derive the wrapping key for the main key.
Cleartext session key
The sessionKey is used for user convenience: once logged in, the session key can be used for the duration of the session to access encrypted data. However, this might not improve security much; it may not be materially less secure to simply store the mainKey itself in cleartext in session storage.
Weak encryption at rest
Although the EncryptedContainer
itself is stored in encrypted form, we also
store all encryption keys needed to decrypt it. This means that the encryption
at rest is at best a "security by obscurity" measure or, more charitably, a
dubious form of "defense in depth". It would thus be preferable to retrieve or
derive the encryption keys from data not stored in cleartext on the client
device.
The session keys could be eliminated in favour of simply re-deriving the prfKey or passwordKey whenever sensitive contents need to be accessed. This would require the user to perform an authentication ceremony (presenting a WebAuthn credential or entering a password) for each access. This may or may not be an acceptable user experience. The keys could be kept in application memory for a short time to avoid bursts of multiple authentication prompts during a single semantic user action. In fact the app already does this when adding or deleting WebAuthn credentials, which each need a corresponding prfKey.
Encrypting privateKey twice
Likewise, encrypting privateKey twice may not materially improve security
either. An adversary with read access to the other PrivateData
members will
likely also have read access to both of local storage and session storage, thus
having access to the keys needed to decrypt privateKey anyway.
passwordKey is not entirely client-side
When a passwordKey is used, the key material and algorithm parameters needed
to derive passwordKey are exposed to the backend service. To make
passwordKey entirely client-side, making it impossible for the backend
service to access the contents of the EncryptedContainer
, a different
passphrase should be used to derive passwordKey than is used to sign in to
the backend service. Alternatively, some password blinding method such as a
PAKE
protocol might be used to keep the backend server from learning the user's
password.
Software keys, not hardware keys
All cryptographic keys used by wwWallet are fundamentally software keys, held in browser memory. This is due to technical limitations, some of which may change in the future.
However, note the difference between encryption keys and signing keys. Encryption and decryption inherently involves exposing the cleartext anyway, so encryption keys do not need to be kept secret from parties accessing the cleartext.
The WebAuthn prf
extension simply returns pseudo-random data which wwWallet
uses to derive encryption keys. Thus the encryption keys are software keys held
by the browser, but the WebAuthn authenticator holding the PRF key is needed in
order to access the PRF outputs. This is sufficient hardware binding for
encryption keys, assuming the browser is benevolent.
Ideally the user's privateKey should be a hardware-bound key, so that even
if the mainKey or the PrivateData
is exposed, an unauthorized party would
still not be able to sign proofs on behalf of the legitimate user. This is not
currently possible due to technical limitations. Although WebAuthn
authentication keys may be hardware-bound, they do not support signing arbitrary
data. Future extensions to the WebAuthn API might add the possibility to sign
arbitrary data with a hardware-bound private key.